The Individual Experience in a World of Categories :: Sociology Sociological Essays

The Individual Experience in a World of Categories Lakoff and Johnson contend for an epitomized mind, saying that our classes depend on how we experience the world through our bodies. As indicated by this hypothesis, because of their various life structures, people would encounter the world distinctively and their classifications would be characteristically unique. Additionally, it would be normal that all ladies would have similar classifications. Our class and our conversations have shown a decent variety of feelings and strategies for arrangement that discredit this piece of Lakoff and Johnson's contention. I feel that Lakoff and Johnson were right in saying that the classifications we structure are a piece of our experience (Lakoff and Johnson 19). Be that as it may, what they fail to factor into their examination of the manner in which people arrange is the distinctions of every individual experience. Classifications and their implications depend on a person's very own insight into the world, and that is the reason no class implies the very same thing for more than one person. I need to analyze the classifications of race and sexuality in Moraga and Delany to show the noteworthiness of the individual experience and its immediate association with classes. Additionally, I need to propose that race as other is more tricky than sexuality to one's very own personality. Delany's Repugnance/Perversion/Diversion presents us with a progression of alarming stories. They all start inside Delany's life, however his explanation behind picking these specific stories is accurately on the grounds that they are strange (Delany 125). Indeed, even inside one's own individual experience, there is a uniqueness to occasions. The class gay doesn't imply that the people who distinguish themselves as a feature of it will share a comprehension of all that it has intended for one individual to guarantee this name for himself/herself. Delany recognizes that the ID with others that classifications make is in a manner bogus, even the likenesses are at long last, to the degree they are living ones, a play of contrasts (Delany 131). He underscores that a great part of the sexual experience stays outside of language. No everything will be shared, not all things can be. A person's excursion to asserting his/her own character is settled in the individual excursion, in events bo th trademark and strange. Be that as it may, possibly these strange stories are not as unique to his experience as Delany accepts. It is truth that they are without a doubt a piece of Delany's understanding as a gay man, and he says himself that there is no all inclusive gay experience.